Last week, after our class discussed numerous readings
relating to Oral History, we got to conduct one of our own. In order to relate
to our larger class project, our discussion consisted of public health
concerns. I spoke with my classmate, John Smith. My oral history with John
covered a lot of ground. We talked about health insurance, going to the
doctor’s office, and writing end-of-the-semester historiography papers.
However, one of the most interesting things John mentioned was how his
awareness of health concerns has really changed since moving to a larger city
like Philadelphia:
I come from the suburbs, you know, the
Poconos Mountains where it’s really rural and spread out. So, we don’t really
talk about health concerns. But, now that I’ve moved to the city – I moved here
a few weeks ago, like at the beginning of the semester – I’m constantly
thinking about where my hands are, what I’m touching, viruses and diseases. You
know, flu season is coming up. It’s always in the back of my mind that I should
be more conscious about health concerns.
I later asked followed up on this response and asked if
being in an urban environment has changed his health concerns:
I don’t think my health concerns have
changed, but I’m maybe more aware. Like I said earlier, just always being in a
large group of people, I’m always thinking, ‘what’s their health like?’ ‘I just
saw them touching this and now, I’m touching this.’ So, it’s a sense of
awareness.
John’s comments really shed light on the ways that the
environments that one finds themselves in can affect health concerns. This
knowledge is quite useful in considering ways to approach a public history
project that seeks to cultivate a broader conversation around public health
concerns within an urban environment.
Also, this week, we read numerous works relating to museum
education. Many of the works stressed the importance of making exhibits
accessible to family members of all ages. The
Museum Educator’s Manual stressed the use of family activities that used
hands-on learning in exhibits as a way involve visitors of all learning
abilities.[1] On
this subject, I found Judy Rand’s article “Write and Design with the Family in
Mind” most helpful.
Rand’s work focuses on making exhibits accessible to
children in a way that stimulates learning and takes developing cognitive
abilities into account. This article encourages curators to create labels that communicate
main points in a minimalistic fashion.[2] I was particularly impressed with the label
relating to Chicago’s industrial past aimed at connecting with children. The
exhibit label evokes the way that industrial Chicago smelled, catching the eye
with evocative statement “History Stinks!” The label also personalizes this
story by asking the visitor, “What does Chicago Smell Like To You?”[3]
This is a question that both adults and children can answer and connect the
industrial city’s past to their present experiences within it. Such a question
makes historical analysis approachable to a wide range of experiences and learning
abilities.
[1]
Anna Johnson et al., The Museum Educator’s
Manual: Educators Share Successful Techniques (Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press,
2009), 79.
[2] Judy
Rand, “Write and Design with Family in Mind,” in Connecting Kids to History with Museum Exhibitions, ed. D. Lynn
McRainey et al. (Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, 2010),258.
[3]
Ibid, 262.
No comments:
Post a Comment